Expectedly, my last week’s article on the above subject generated considerable interests. I got numerous inquiries via mail and Twitter on some of the issues raised in it. The contemporary unemployment situation in Nigeria makes the competition for the few available job spaces keen.
Nigeria is not a solo traveller on the corridor of unemployment. According to a 2012 International Labour Organisation report, of the 202 million people unemployed globally, 40 per cent of them are youths. The ILO estimates that about 30 million more people became unemployed globally as against 170 million people in 2007. And 75 million people of this figure are young men and women.
In Sub-Saharan Africa, the picture is not too different; youth population continues to rise swiftly. About 297 million people are between the ages of 10 and 24. That is about 297 million youths. By 2050, the projection is that 561 million people would be youth on the continent. If the age bracket is expanded to 35 years (which captures the job-seeking population on the continent) in concord with the African Youth Charter then the figure would likely double.
Nigeria, the most populated country on the continent, had 54 per cent of her youth population unemployed in 2012, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. The report indicates that two in five Nigerian youths are currently unemployed. The clear implication of this is that it is a difficult task to get a job in Nigeria. That is one sound reason why the first step, which is sending an application, has to be excellently done.
Back to the story of the experience I started recalling last week, one of the applications also copied (cc: carbon copy) three other email addresses and one could not but wonder to what end that was supposed to serve. Was the applicant informing a friend or was he or she sending it to his or her other email addresses to serve as reservoir for applications? It is also erroneous to leave a blank subject line. Every mail serves a particular purpose and it is only civilised to label it in that light. This is in addition to labelling the document(s) being sent appropriately as mentioned last week.
One major goof that featured consistently was the inconsistency in font types and sizes used in the curriculum vitae and the letter that followed. The employer is human and it is only smart of an applicant to make his job easier. He or she is seeking for the right candidate for the opening and it means there is an obligation to read through the letter and the curriculum vitae. The document should be easy on the eyes. This means a single font should preferably be used throughout the length of the document. Is there an official font for applications?
Not necessarily; as there are a number of fonts that serves official purposes (‘Googling’ official fonts may help). It all depends on the preference of the applicant.
Also incorrect is the use of the lower case all through the document. The font size should also not be too big. For most official fonts, anything between 10.5 and 12 is fine. There is also that problem about aligning documents. In my judgment, I think this was the major problem with most of the applications. The document should be justified. The spacing should be decent, bullet points similar and the document should be like a properly-done make-up — good to look at, superficial and certainly not distracting.
The grammar and spellings in some instances were also awful. Most word applications have a spell check provision that can be deplored. And even when it is not enough, respect for the application process would make the applicant to seek help from friends and family. See it as the first meeting with the prospective employer and you are already sending an unsuitable indicator. Predictably, as a number of employers have complained since the new media waves hit us, there were equally a number of social media-styled abbreviations in the cover letter.
Seeking help from another pair of eyes before sending such could help in correcting this fatal blunder. We also saw applications that had attachments we did not require; at least, at that moment. The Primary School Leaving Certificate, Project Management Certification, National Youth Service Corps Certificate and a number of others were attached by a particular applicant and it was plainly wrong to have done so.
One dominant issue in the emails I received following the first part of this commentary is the issue of referees. A particular reader sought to know the propriety of saying ‘available on request’. My thought is this – at that primary stage of decision-making by the employer, the merit of your personal profile is what would count and not that of your referees. However, if one is fortunate to be called for an interview, then it is the responsibility of the interviewee to have all the referees and their contacts neatly typed on a sheet. Of course, this should be clearly titled; for example – ‘Referees for Victoria Daniel’ – and should also carry a summary of your personal details again.
Nevertheless, these things are not cast in stone, especially since we know there are instances of people who have got jobs despite not having colourful CVs. I also do not think it is appropriate to display referees’ phone numbers indiscriminately. An email address at most and maybe job specification of the referee should suffice given the proliferation of phony vacancies. At least, save your referees from potential scammers!
Applicants should also take note not to send PDF documents. It is not a preference, except when the employer specifically requests for it. And wait for this: three of the CVs we got also had the passport photograph of the applicant on the CV. I think only a modelling agency would likely admire such misplaced ingenuity! Graphics and designs should generally be avoided in any business correspondence of this nature.
The concluding part of this subject will occupy this space next week. I am hoping to dig my claws into the future of job applications and how the social media would count in that almost foreseeable future. Let’s continue the conversation.
BY ’SOLA FAGORUSI
Download National Dialogue Committee's Reports (in PDF)
Follow on Twitter to receive updates every hour
Don't miss the next news item - LIKE our Facebook page
No comments:
Post a Comment