Learning, they say, is a continuum of experiences. I recently had cause to support a start-up organisation in accessing email applications and conducting interviews for shortlisted applicants. It offered me a deeper insight into the dynamics of job search and screening process. Few curriculum vitae were carefully and brilliantly crafted while more than 70 per cent of the applications fell short of basic expectation; not in terms of the qualification of applicants but in terms of the shoddy email content and document formats.
I had my first curriculum vitae when I was 16. I had just left secondary school about a year earlier and wanted to get busy while awaiting admission into a tertiary institution as young people of my age then were in the habit of doing. I had seen a number of curriculum vitae at home; they were my father’s possession, dropped then by graduates seeking his help with job placements. I took two of them and, based on my lean experience and exposure, I came up with an honest document barely more than a page and half and paid a business centre attendant to have it typed.
The two different jobs I sought, I got them majorly on the merit of the resume. I recall that the executive director of a non-profit who was the final interviewer was impressed that I had such a document to my name at that age. Last time, I dug up the document from my archive; I smiled at the knowledge of the naivety and juvenile bravery of that period.
Of the almost 40 applications we had to review, I recall seeing a CV that looked almost like what I had several years back. There was nothing thick to take away from it to fully access the applicant with. It was merely about the institutions the applicant had attended but with changed times, we now know the hood does not make a monk. Before the interview, the CV and oftenthe cover letter are the only documents with which the employer measures and sort of tests the quality and ability of the candidate. It is the first assessment and a lot depends on it. If anything, applicants owe themselves the responsibility of ensuring that the document(s) snatches the attention of the employer, especially among the sea of several others. Given that the call for applications in question ran for just five days, which was partly during the Yuletide, it was understandable that thousands of applications were not received as in now the norm. The application call and request was clear. The job description was spelt out; the documents needed were clearly stated and in the manner in which they should be attached. A few more instructions followed and applicants were asked to stick with the instructions. Surprisingly, only about 20 per cent of applicants adhered to the instructions as stated. This piece is one I chose to write based on this limited experience, hoping it would set some applicants who can afford to read through the length on the right path and possibly have them get it right and better their prospects.
Since most applications are now requested through the new media channel, it means the success of an application does not starts from this phase. Usually, it starts with the email address and the delivered name of the sender. Courtesy and expediency make it wrong to use email addresses that come across as playful. Some of the examples we got were in the mould of the following - okonjo4real@yahoo.com, guyamaechi@hotmail.com, ribadu4luv@yahoo.com handsomesheggzy@gmail.com oduah2000x@onebox.com
These are possibly the type that were opened when email was just becoming popular in Nigeria and we paid cybercafé attendants to open an email for us. It is always better if email addresses bear the full names or an abbreviation of one of the names of the applicants. aminuturaki@yahoo.com, aturaki@gmail.com, aminu_turaki@hotmail.com or aminu.turaki@gmail.com
These come across as better. It costs nothing to have such carefully decided upon and officially toned email address. Also, key is the name that drops in the box of the employer. It should be the name of the employee (with the first letter of each name being in capital letter) and not the email address as was the case with this experience or a name that is an alias. Any applicant with such can adjust this through the setting option of the email service provider. It is best to think like the employer. We decided to give all the applicants a chance in this case and coincidentally, we discovered that the seven candidates that were shortlisted for interview did not have funny email addresses and followed through all the instructions. The interpretation on empirical basis is that employers can justifiably ignore applicants who do not follow through instructions and meet basic but unwritten expectations.
In a particular instance, an applicant sent his own mail application with a friend’s mail address; so the CV carried a name different from the sender. Another simply forwarded the CV and cover letter that had been earlier sent to another organisation. The name of the organisation was visible and the cover letter was seeking for a job different from what this particular employer was calling for. In drafting a cover letter, it is also important that it is properly edited and the addresses placed appropriately in tandem with basic letter writing skill. The thinking of an average employer is that if an applicant is not meticulous enough with a task as simple as sending an application, he or she is not likely to be on the job.
I also saw different names applicants used in saving the documents they attached to the mail. Some carried names like – multipurpose CV, skjnewcv, dorcas+cv, bankcv. It should not be the case. Documents should be properly labelled to suit the purpose. And since there would be several people sending CVs to the same email address, it is good such a document carries the name of the applicant to make it easy to sort out. ‘Inspection Officer Application from Rotimi Wakoli’ is an example of how it should be done unless an instruction states otherwise.
There should also be a content or body of the email. I suppose it is wrong to simply attach the necessary document(s) and send a blank mail. The space is a good way to quickly sell oneself by writing a summary of the purpose of the mail and end with a signature that carries your name and other new media contact which may include ones Twitter handle, LinkedIn account, Facebook link, especially if they are rich enough and the applicant is sure of the content present in these places. They may serve to enhance the quality of the application.
Where possible, a research about the organisation or the industry calling for the application may also serve the applicant’s interest. I recall an opening I rued missing simply because I was not patient enough to research. My guess is that I did not get a response simply because I had sent a ‘Dear Sir’ instead of a ‘Dear Ma’. When later I tried to find out what went wrong, it turned out that the CEO whom I sent my document to is a feminist and I was blind not to have seen that on the site. Writing a ‘Dear Sir’ was interpreted to indicate male chauvinism.
Click here to read the Part 2 edition of this post
Click here to read the Part 2 edition of this post
BY ’SOLA FAGORUSI
Follow on Twitter to receive updates every hour
Don't miss the next news item - LIKE our Facebook page
No comments:
Post a Comment